STATE v. NATOLI


237 N.J. Super. 52 (1989)

566 A.2d 1167

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BARTOLOME D. NATOLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 20, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald A. Caminiti argued the cause for appellant (Breslin and Breslin, attorneys; Donald A. Caminiti and Kevin C. Corriston, on the brief).

Terri A. DelGreco, Special Deputy Attorney General, Acting Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John G. Holl, Assistant Attorney General-In Charge, Acting Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent; Ulrike M. Bergin, Special Deputy Attorney General, Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER and LONG.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant Bartolome D. Natoli was convicted by the Special Civil Part of a charge of driving while intoxicated. He appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction, and we now transfer the matter to the Law Division for a de novo trial pursuant to R. 3:23-8.

As a historical matter, the courts of limited criminal jurisdiction having initial jurisdiction over traffic offenses were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases