1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio App.3d 224 (1989)
 

STATE v. FARKAS

No. 56122.

64 Ohio App.3d 224 (1989)

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. FARKAS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County.

Decided November 20, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Corrigan, Prosecuting Attorney, and Judith Hritz, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Stuart H. Lippe and Mary Cay Tylee, for appellant.

NAHRA, Judge.

Defendant Andrew Farkas is appealing his conviction of attempted possession of criminal tools (R.C. 2923.24 and 2923.02). He contends he was convicted with insufficient evidence, convicted of the wrong offense, and convicted unconstitutionally under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the federal Constitution and under Sections 9 and 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. Because we agree that defendant was charged and convicted of an improper offense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases