1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 148 A.D.2d
  5. 148 A.D.2d 130 (1989)
 

CONCERNED CITIZENS v. TOWN BD.

148 A.D.2d 130 (1989)

In the Matter of Schodack Concerned Citizens et al., Appellants, v. Town Board of the Town of Schodack et al., Respondents, and Hannaford Brothers Company et al., Intervenors-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

July 13, 1989

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis B. Oliver for appellants.

Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna (Phillip H. Dixon of counsel), for Town Board of the Town of Schodack and others, respondents.

Dudley & Associates (David R. Dudley of counsel), for Rensselaer County Industrial Development Agency, respondent.

Shanley, Sweeney & Reilly (J. Michael Naughton of counsel), for intervenors-respondents.

WEISS, J. P., MIKOLL, YESAWICH, JR., and HARVEY, JJ., concur.

MERCURE, J.

In March 1988, Hannaford Brothers Company (hereinafter Hannaford) announced its proposal to construct a distribution facility (hereinafter the facility) on a 100-acre parcel near the intersection of U.S. Route 9 and Interstate Route 90 in the Town of Schodack, Rensselaer County. Hannaford subsequently applied to respondent Town Board of the Town of Schodack for a zone change from Residential-Agricultural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases