In re PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, Debtor.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 22, 1989.
March 22, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Richard Levin, Martin L. Gross, Concord, N.H., Don Willenburg, Los Angeles, Cal. for Public Service Co.
Joel Zweibel, New York City, J. Michael Deasy, Richard C. Gagliuso, Nashua, N.H., Michael S. Schneider, New York City, for Unsecured Creditors Committee.
Richard N. Tilton, Howard J. Berman, for Equity Committee.
Larry M. Smukler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Concord, N.H., Norman H. Stahl, Mark W. Vaughn, Daniel J. Callaghan, Manchester, N.H., for State of N.H.
Virginia A. Greiman, Wellesley Hills, Mass., U.S. Trustee.
George J. Wade, Barbara J. Gould, New York City, David J. Dunfey, Hampton, N.H., for Citicorp and Consolidated Utilities & Communications, Inc. (CUC).
Robert E. Ducharme, Manchester, N.H., for First Fidelity Bank and Amoskeag Bank.
John B. Nolan, Jeffrey G. Grody, Hartford, Conn., for Northeast Utilities Service Co.
Ted A. Berkowitz, John F. Pritchard, New York City, for First Fidelity Bank.
Daniel M. Glosband, Boston, Mass., for United Illuminating, New England Power, EUA Power Corp., Canal Elec. Co., Connecticut Light & Power Co., and Montaup Elec. Co.
Robert Drain, New York City, for Shearson, Lehman, Hutton, Inc.
John C. Ransmeier, Concord, N.H., for Vermont Public Service Corp.
Jack Lahey, for Business & Indus. Assn. of New Hampshire.
Victor Bass, Boston, Mass., for Maryland Nat. Bank.
Peter Baylor, Boston, Mass., for Bank of New England.
Robert A. Backus, Manchester, N.H., for Seacoast Anti-Pollution Group, Citizens within the 10-Mile Radius, Campaign for Rate-Payer's Rights.
Nathan M. Fuchs, New York City, for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Com'n.
Diane L. Donley, Washington, D.C., for the F.E.R.C. and Nuclear Regulatory Com'n.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire.
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF EXAMINER
JAMES E. YACOS, Bankruptcy Judge.
On January 20, 1989 this court issued an Amended Order to Show Cause Re Appointment of Examiner (Court Document No. 1609). The court stated that "if the parties in interest cannot reach a consensual agreement on rate levels, this court will consider . . . whether the appointment of a neutral, disinterested person with requisite expertise on rate impact questions should...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
