BLISKO v. BLISKO


149 A.D.2d 127 (1989)

Eli Blisko, Respondent, v. Esther Blisko, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 21, 1989


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clair & Daniele (Bernard E. Clair of counsel), for appellant.

MANGANO, J. P., BRACKEN and SPATT, JJ., concur.


HARWOOD, J.

In Gunn v Gunn (143 A.D.2d 393, 396), we suggested that, where the Supreme Court enters judgment denying matrimonial relief, it is premature to fix a durational limit on any maintenance awarded to one spouse payable by the other. We now directly hold that, absent a judgment altering the marital relationship, the Supreme Court is without authority to prospectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases