IN RE COMPLAINT OF RESIDENTS OF STRUTHERS

No. 88-1147.

45 Ohio St. 3d 227 (1989)

IN RE COMPLAINT OF RESIDENTS OF STRUTHERS, OHIO, AGAINST ORDINANCE NO. 87-8482 OF THE CITY OF STRUTHERS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Breckenridge & McCroom and E. Winther McCroom, for appellants.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Robert S. Tongren and Thomas C. Nader, for appellee.


SWEENEY, J.

As a preliminary matter, it would appear that the Struthers ordinance is facially unconstitutional under Section 5, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution,1 since it was passed as an emergency measure and was effective "immediately." As emergency legislation, the ordinance appears to conflict with the thirty-days and referendum provisions of the aforementioned constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases