1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 148 A.D.2d
  5. 148 A.D.2d 101 (1989)
 

INVESTIGATION v. PASSANNANTE

148 A.D.2d 101 (1989)

In the Matter of New York City Department of Investigation, Respondent, v. Caesar Passannante et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 6, 1989

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel (Larry A. Sonnenshein with him on the brief; Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel, attorney), for respondent.

Ronald H. Alenstein of counsel (Jonathan M. Landsman with him on the brief; Shea & Gould, attorneys), for appellants.

CARRO, MILONAS and RUBIN, JJ., concur.

ROSS, J. P.

This appeal requires us to determine the validity of a nonjudicial subpoena duces tecum issued by the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI).

From 1979 until early 1988, Mr. Caesar Passannante and his company, The Network Group, Inc. (Network), performed consulting services for the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT), which is located at 227 West 27th Street, New York County. During...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases