This appeal requires us to determine the level of suspicion, if any, necessary under the Federal and State Constitutions to justify singling out an entrant at the national border for a pat-down search. Defendant contends that the same "reasonable suspicion" required for stops and frisks in domestic situations should apply (see, Terry v Ohio,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. LUNA
73 N.Y.2d 173 (1989)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Julio Luna, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 5, 1989.
Decided February 21, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER concur with Judge HANCOCK, JR.; Judge BELLACOSA concurs in result in a separate opinion; Judge TITONE taking no part.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.