1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 876 F.2d
  5. 876 F.2d 1578 (1989)
 

MICRO MOTION INC. v. EXAC CORP.

No. 88-1643.

876 F.2d 1578 (1989)

MICRO MOTION INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXAC CORPORATION, Defendant, v. NEPTUNE MEASUREMENT COMPANY, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse J. Jenner, Fish & Neave, New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief, were David J. Lee, Christa Hildebrand and John O. Tramontine.

Seymour Rothstein, Daniel A. Boehnen and Robert H. Resis, Allegretti & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., were on the brief, for defendant.

Ivan S. Kavrukov, Cooper & Dunham, New York City, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief, was Dale Gaudier, Neptune Intern. Corp., Atlanta, Ga., of counsel. Jules P. Kirsch, Cooper & Dunham, New York City, of counsel.

Before NIES and ARCHER, Circuit Judges, and NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

NIES, Circuit Judge.

For reasons more fully explicated in the decision in the related proceeding captioned Micro Motion Incorporated v. Exac Corporation v. Smith Meter, Incorporated, 826 F.2d 1574, issued concurrently, Neptune Measurement Company is ordered to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Neptune is another competitor of Micro Motion in the Coriolis mass flowmeter market. Neptune also has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases