HUNT v. HUNT

No. 11213.

63 Ohio App.3d 178 (1989)

HUNT, Appellant, v. HUNT, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County.

Decided June 8, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carroll E. Hunt, pro se. Robert A. Bostick, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Plaintiff-appellant Carroll E. Hunt appeals from the dismissal of his divorce action as a result of the trial court's finding that he had failed to prove grounds. Because this action was dismissed following the close of the plaintiff's evidence, Mr. Hunt contends that it could only have been dismissed if the trial court, pursuant to the provision for a directed verdict contained in Civ.R. 50(A)(4), after having considered the evidence most strongly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases