1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 56 Wn.
  5. 56 Wn. App. 181 (1989)
 

MARSHALL v. AC & S, INC.

No. 22129-9-I.

56 Wn. App. 181 (1989)

782 P.2d 1107

JAMES S. MARSHALL, Appellant, v. AC & S, INC., ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

December 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley R. Marshall, for appellant.

Kent Van Den Berg, Thomas Sorenson, and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, for respondents AC& S, Inc., et al.

Mark S. Clark, Laurie Chyz, Gregory Keller, and Hillis, Clark, Martin & Peterson, for respondent Celotex Corp.

Michael S. Toot and Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, for respondent Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

PER CURIAM:

James S. Marshall appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of the respondents, a group of asbestos manufacturers. A Commissioner granted a court's motion on the merits pursuant to RAP 18.14. Marshall has moved to modify the Commissioner's ruling. We grant the motion to modify only for the purpose of adopting the Commissioner's analysis in this published opinion.

Marshall was exposed to asbestos products while employed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases