STATE EX REL. CONNOR v. McGOUGH

No. 89-443.

46 Ohio St. 3d 188 (1989)

THE STATE, EX REL. CONNOR, v. McGOUGH, JUDGE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 15, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Forrest A. Norman and Ernest A. Auciello, Jr., for relator.

Gregory A. White, prosecuting attorney, and John S. Keressi, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

The crucial issue is whether prohibition is an appropriate remedy to vindicate a nonresident's right to due process thereby preventing a trial court from improperly asserting personal jurisdiction over him. We find prohibition appropriate, and issue that write.

Since prohibition is an extraordinary writ, we do not grant it routinely or easily:

"For a writ of prohibition to issue, a relator must ordinarily establish: (1) that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases