1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 890 F.2d
  5. 890 F.2d 1438 (1989)
 

DAVIS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Nos. 88-1905, 88-2735, 88-2884, 88-15473 and 88-15474.

890 F.2d 1438 (1989)

Fontaine DAVIS, Eric H. Washington; Jerilyn North; Robert L. Demmons; Jimmie Braden; Audry Lee; Early Davis; Brandi Swanson; Susan Moorehead; Anne Young; Mary M. Carder; Theresa Rodigou; Kathleen J. Bradshaw; Patricia Murray; International Association of Black Firefighters-San Francisco Chapter; United States of America, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation, et al.; Defendants-Appellees, John W. Flaherty; Edward E. Murphy; William M. Shaughnessy; Alfred E. Smyth; Respondents-Appellants, San Francisco Firefighters, Local 798, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Fontaine Davis, et al., Plaintiffs in Intervention/Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendant-Appellee, v. SAN FRANCISCO FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 798, Defendant in Intervention/Appellant (Four Cases). Fontaine DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. SAN FRANCISCO FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 798, Defendant in Intervention/Appellant (Three Cases). Fontaine DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. SAN FRANCISCO FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 798, Defendant in Intervention/Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 4, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duane W. Reno, Davis Reno & Courtney, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in intervention-appellant.

William C. McNeill, III, Employment Law Center, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in intervention-appellees.

Louise H. Renne, City Atty., Dan Siegel, Chief of Complex Litigation, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before FARRIS, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant San Francisco Firefighters Local No. 798 ("the Union") challenges a consent decree executed by the City and County of San Francisco ("the City") and various individuals and organizations who intervened as plaintiffs in the underlying suit (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Davis").1 The consent decree settled Title VII class action litigation in which it was contended that the San Francisco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases