KONDRAT v. RALPH INGERSOLL PUBLISHING

No. 88-L-13-150.

56 Ohio App. 3d 173 (1989)

KONDRAT, APPELLANT, v. RALPH INGERSOLL PUBLISHING COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lake County.

Decided April 10, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Kondrat, pro se.

David L. Herzer and Richard D. Panza, for appellees.


CHRISTLEY, P.J.

This is an accelerated calendar case.

Despite appellant's failure to include in his brief a statement of the assigned errors, as required under App. R. 16(A)(2), a review of his brief shows that: one, appellant does not dispute the merits of the trial court's decision; and two, appellant contends the Supreme Court erred in not disqualifying the trial judge for alleged prejudice.

The Supreme Court has specifically held that a court of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases