1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 878 F.2d
  5. 878 F.2d 1413 (1989)
 

BELFONT SALES CORPORATION. v. UNITED STATES

No. 89-1078.

878 F.2d 1413 (1989)

BELFONT SALES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 23, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Sosnov, Sosnov & Associates, Norristown, Pa., argued for plaintiff-appellee.

James A. Curley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office. Also on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, U.S. Customs Service, of counsel.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges.

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade holding that battery-operated quartz analog watches are classified, and dutiable as an entirety, under item 688.45 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United States, 666 F.Supp. 1568 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987), reh'g denied, 698 F.Supp. 916

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases