TAYLOR v. BOTNICK MOTOR CORP.


146 A.D.2d 81 (1989)

Barbara M. Taylor et al., Respondents, v. Botnick Motor Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 23, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smyk & Smyk (Stephen D. Smyk of counsel), for appellant.

Shaw, O'Brien & Crowley (David F. Crowley of counsel), for respondents.

Kramer, Wales & Wright (Roger N. Lavinsky and Philip J. Kramer of counsel), for Helen M. Walicke, amicus curiae.

Scott C. Gottlieb for Katherine J. Croll, amicus curiae.

KANE, J. P., CASEY, MIKOLL and MERCURE, JJ., concur.


YESAWICH, JR., J.

For purposes of this appeal, defendant concedes the facts asserted in a deposition, given in a related action, by Katherine Croll. In June 1983, Croll, then 17 years old, and her boyfriend, Rodney Krause, went to defendant's establishment to purchase a used car. While there they were induced to buy a new car instead, a 1983 Chevette, by defendant's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases