1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 213 Conn.
  5. 213 Conn. 13 (1989)
 

CHOTKOWSKI v. STATE

(13683)

213 Conn. 13 (1989)

LUDMIL CHOTKOWSKI v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released November 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Krzys, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Taka Iwashita, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, attorney general, and Charles A. Overend, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (state).

PETERS, C. J., SHEA, CALLAHAN, GLASS and COVELLO, JS.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for breach of an employment contract the trial court rendered summary judgment for the defendant state of Connecticut on the ground that the plaintiff, Ludmil Chotkowski,1 as a state employee in the classified service, had no contractual rights, express or implied, against the state as his employer but only those rights made available to state employees by statute. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases