STATE v. YOUNGBLOOD

Nos. 2 CA-CR 3979, 2 CA-CR 4364-2 and 2 CA-CR 89-0141.

164 Ariz. 61 (1989)

790 P.2d 759

The STATE of Arizona, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Larry YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Petition for Review Granted in Part and Denied in Part May 24, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima Co. Atty. by John R. Gustafson, Special Deputy, Phoenix, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Daniel F. Davis, Tucson, for appellant/cross-appellee.


OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

In this appeal on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Larry Youngblood once again argues for reversal of his convictions for child molestation, sexual assault and kidnapping because evidence crucial to his defense was lost.

We find that Youngblood was deprived of a fair trial and denied due process of law under the Arizona Constitution and well-established Arizona case law because the failure to preserve certain evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases