HARTSOCK v. CHRYSLER CORP.

No. 88-229.

44 Ohio St. 3d 171 (1989)

HARTSOCK, APPELLEE, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 2, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gutierrez, Mackey & Gwin Co., L.P.A., Roy Gutierrez and James S. Gwin, for appellee.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and George H. Rosin, for appellant Chrysler Corporation.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and William M. O'Neill, for appellant James Mayfield, Administrator, Bureau of Workers' Compensation et al.


WOLFF, J.

R.C. 4123.519 provides in part:

"The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission or of its staff hearing officer made pursuant to division (B)(6) of section 4121.35 of the Revised Code in any injury or occupational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas of the county in which the injury was inflicted * * *."

It has long been the law of Ohio that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases