KING v. GIBBS

Nos. 88-2668, 88-3441.

876 F.2d 1275 (1989)

Joan Harding KING, et al., Original Plaintiffs, v. Bruce J. GIBBS, Defendant and Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard C. BLUM, William Roach, Edward Scarff, Arthur H. Stromberg, William D. Walsh and Advanced Systems, Inc., Defendants and Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided June 1, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Cook, Richard D. Darby, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for defendant and cross-claim plaintiff-appellant.

Joel G. Chefitz, Patrick J. Lamb, Katten Muchin & Zavis, Chicago, Ill., for defendant and cross-claim defendants-appellees.

Before COFFEY, FLAUM, and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.


FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

In Heizer Corporation v. Ross, 601 F.2d 330, 334 (7th Cir.1979), we held that a securities wrongdoer was not entitled under federal law to indemnification for its liabilities. Gibbs, the cross-claim plaintiff, claims that as an innocent defendant, rather than a wrongdoer, the rule of Heizer is inapplicable to his case. The district court held that even if Gibbs could prove that he was innocent,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases