1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 116 N.J.
  5. 116 N.J. 99 (1989)
 

STATE v. JOHNSON

116 N.J. 99 (1989)

561 A.2d 243

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HUBERT JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter M. Jacques, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum Public Defender, attorney).

Virginia M. Lincoln, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Herbert H. Tate, Jr., Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The only issue in this appeal is whether the trial court's findings are sufficient to permit appellate review of its determination that the State has failed to meet its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant's confession was voluntary. The Appellate Division, which had previously rejected as inadequate the trial court's fact-findings, 218 N.J.Super. 290

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases