1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 886 F.2d
  5. 886 F.2d 1228 (1989)
 

HOLLYWOOD v. CITY OF SANTA MARIA

Nos. 87-6455, 89-55350.

886 F.2d 1228 (1989)

Marian HOLLYWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA MARIA; Dorothy Lyman; Michael A. Maramonte; Wayne Schwammel, Defendants-Appellees. (Two Cases)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan A. Blakeboro, Matsinger & Blakeboro, Santa Barbara, Cal., for Marian Hollywood.

Mary L. Dowell, Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson, Los Angeles, Cal., for City of Santa Maria.

Richard R. Terzian, Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, Los Angeles, Cal., for Dorothy Lyman, Michael A. Maramonte, and Wayne Schwammel.

Arthur R. Montanden, City Atty. of Santa Maria, Cal., for City of Santa Maria.

Before SCHROEDER, BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Submitted to Motions Panel June 12, 1989*.

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

The question we must decide in this case is whether either of plaintiff-appellant's two notices of appeal is timely. Plaintiff-appellant, by her then counsel, filed her first notice of appeal after judgment was entered but before entry of the order denying her motion for new trial. Several months after entry of the order, she replaced her former attorney with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases