COAKLEY v. MURPHY

No. 88-3784.

884 F.2d 1218 (1989)

James E. COAKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alfred I. MURPHY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Coakley, Twin Falls, Idaho, in pro per.

No appearance for defendants-appellees.

Before FARRIS, NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.


LEAVY, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

James E. Coakley (Coakley) appears pro se to appeal the district court's order dismissing his in forma pauperis action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (West 1982).1 Coakley contends (1) he was denied due process and equal protection when he was returned without a hearing to prison from a work release facility after he refused to sign a work release agreement; and (2) the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases