1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 712 F.Supp.
  5. 712 F.Supp. 1386 (1989)
 

U.S. v. SYUFY ENTERPRISES

No. C-86-3057 WHO.

712 F.Supp. 1386 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. SYUFY ENTERPRISES and Raymond J. Syufy, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 3, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard M. Hollander, Richard S. Nicholson, Marc W.F. Galonsky, Antitrust Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Gary R. Spratling, Antitrust Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Maxwell M. Blecher, Beverly S. Tillett, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION

ORRICK, District Judge.

In a major effort to force the contemporary relevant product market in the motion picture industry—consisting of first-run exhibits, sub-run exhibits, and exhibits on home video, cable television, and pay-perview television—into the procrustean strictures of the relevant product market—consisting solely of first-run exhibits—established forty years ago in the legendary Paramount case,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases