1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 879 F.2d
  5. 879 F.2d 1211 (1989)
 

IN RE IMPOUNDED CASE (LAW FIRM)

Nos. 88-5940, 89-5152.

879 F.2d 1211 (1989)

In re IMPOUNDED CASE (LAW FIRM).

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided July 24, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Perle (argued), Hayden, Perle & Silbur, Hoboken, N.J., for appellants.

Samuel A. Alito, Jr., U.S. Atty., Edna Ball Axelrod, Chief Appeals Div., Marion Percell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richard J. Schechter, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Newark, N.J., for appellees.

Before SEITZ, SLOVITER and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Circuit Judge.

These two appeals were consolidated for argument before this court. The origin of this controversy is recounted in our earlier opinion. In re Impounded Case (Law Firm), 840 F.2d 196 (3d Cir.1988). We will repeat that scenario only to the extent necessary to an understanding of the issues raised on these appeals.

In 1985, in a miscellaneous criminal proceeding, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases