1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 745 F.Supp.
  5. 745 F.Supp. 1331 (1989)
 

QUALITY TECHNOLOGY v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING

No. CIV-1-87-054.

745 F.Supp. 1331 (1989)

QUALITY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., Stemar Corporation, Beta, Inc., and Steven A. White, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, S.D.

Opinion on Motion to Alter or Amend June 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry L. Dadds and W. Ferber Tracy, Spears, Moore, Rebman & Williams, Chattanooga, Tenn., and Donna Keene Holt, Gilreath & Associates, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Edward S. Christenbury, Gen. Counsel, James E. Fox, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Justin M. Schwamm, Sr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert C. Glinski, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Brent R. Marquand, Thomas C. Doolan, Helen de Haven, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

EDGAR, District Judge.

The defendants in this civil action have filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint, or in the alternative, for summary judgment as to those claims therein. (Court File No. 31). In support of their motion, defendants have filed the affidavits of two present, and one former, TVA Office of Nuclear Power employees, as well as that of a TVA attorney. (Court File Nos. 32-35). The plaintiffs have responded in opposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases