1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 769 P.2d
  5. 769 P.2d 1292 (1989)
 

VIDAL v. STATE

No. 18530.

769 P.2d 1292 (1989)

Ernesto M. VIDAL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

March 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark B. Bailus, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Brian McKay, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Rex Bell, Dist. Atty., James Tufteland and Thomas Leen, Deputy Dist. Attys., Clark County, for respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

A jury convicted appellant Ernesto M. Vidal of (1) possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell and (2) trafficking in a controlled substance. See NRS 453.337; NRS 453.3385. Vidal seeks reversal of his convictions upon numerous grounds. For reasons hereinafter stated, we reverse the conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell and affirm the conviction for trafficking in a controlled substance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases