1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 161 Ariz.
  5. 161 Ariz. 42 (1989)
 

FISHER v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. 2 CA-SA 89-0074.

161 Ariz. 42 (1989)

775 P.2d 1106

Frederick Herman FISHER, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the STATE of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA; Honorable Bernardo Velasco, Judge of Division 11, Respondents. and the STATE of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

July 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pima County Legal Defender by James U. Glanville, Tucson, for petitioner.

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Sandra M. Hansen, Tucson, for real party in interest.

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks special action relief from the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment in this matter with prejudice on the ground that the real party in interest, the State of Arizona, has violated the anti-shuttling provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), A.R.S. § 31-481. Because of the important issues raised by this petition, we accept jurisdiction. For the reasons stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases