1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 710 F.Supp.
  5. 710 F.Supp. 1290 (1989)
 

U.S. v. GRAHAM

No. CR-88-0667 WHO.

710 F.Supp. 1290 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William GRAHAM and Gregory Corley, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 7, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Russoniello, U.S. Atty., and Rudy M. Orjales, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff U.S.

Barry Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Robert Nelson, Asst. Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant William Graham.

Stuart Hanlon, Tamburello & Hanlon, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Gregory Corley.

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

Defendants, William Graham and Gregory Corley, both pled guilty to Count Three of an indictment charging them with conspiracy to manufacture and distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Sentencing is governed by the substantive offense, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines ("Guidelines"). On March 29, 1989, in anticipation of the sentencing hearing scheduled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases