AIR CAL, INC. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Nos. 86-2520, 86-2530.

865 F.2d 1112 (1989)

AIR CAL, INC.; Air Canada; Alaska Airlines, Inc.; American Airlines, Inc.; Braniff, Inc.; Canadian Pacific Air Lines, Inc.; Continental Air Lines, Inc.; Delta Air Lines, Inc.; Eastern Airlines, Inc.; Evergreen International Air Lines, Inc.; Frontier Airlines, Inc.; Northwest Airlines, Inc.; Pacific Southwest Airlines, Inc.; Pan American World Airways, Inc.; Piedmont Aviation, Inc.; Purolator Courier, Inc.; Republic Airlines, Inc.; Trans World Airlines, Inc.; United Air Lines, Inc.; USAir, Inc.; and Western Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; the Airports Commission of the City and County of San Francisco; Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellants, San Mateo Central Labor Council; SFO Airport Labor Coalition, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants, and San Francisco Labor Council; SEIU Local 87; SEIU Local 77, Defendants-Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louise H. Renne, City Atty., Burk E. Delventhal and Judith A. Boyajian, Deputy City Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

James L. Meeder, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Los Angeles, Cal., and Philip R. Diamond, Bickel & Diamond, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Marie M. Rongone, Beeson, Tayer, Silbert & Bodine, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-intervenors-appellants.

Before TANG, CANBY and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.


TANG, Circuit Judge:

The City and County of San Francisco (the City), along with the San Mateo Central Labor Council and the San Francisco Airport Labor Coalition (labor organizations) as intervenors, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Air Cal, Inc. and nineteen other airlines (Airlines). At issue is a San Francisco city ordinance which requires most airport contractors, lessees, franchisees and others, to pay not less than the "prevailing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases