1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 715 F.Supp.
  5. 715 F.Supp. 1234 (1989)
 

FEERICK v. ARTHUR YOUNG & CO.

No. 89 Civ. 0523 (KTD).

715 F.Supp. 1234 (1989)

Robert M. FEERICK, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY, Arthur Young United States and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 26, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nims, Howes, Collison & Isner, New York City, for plaintiff; Oliver P. Howes, Jr., of counsel.

Carl D. Liggio, Gen. Counsel, Scott M. Univer, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arthur Young & Company, New York City, for defendants; Robyn L. Neal, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.

Defendants Arthur Young & Co. and Arthur Young United States (collectively "Arthur Young") move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. P. 56(c) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. They also move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 for the imposition of sanctions. For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment is granted and the motion for sanctions is denied.

FACTS

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases