1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 881 F.2d
  5. 881 F.2d 1067 (1989)
 

U.S. v. JULIE RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 89-1232.

881 F.2d 1067 (1989)

The UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. JULIE RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 7, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheryl L. Floyd, of the Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With her on the brief were Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and David M. Cohen, Director. Of counsel was Captain Peter J. Comodeca, of the Office of the Judge Advocate Gen., Dept. of the Army, Washington, D.C.

Cyrus E. Phillips, IV, of McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The United States Department of the Army (government) appeals that part of the decision of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (Board), 1989-1 BCA ¶ 21,213, ordering the Department of the Army to reimburse the permanent indefinite judgment fund for bid protest costs awarded to Julie Research Laboratories, Inc. (Julie).

I

The Department of the Army Missile Command issued a sol citation for a multi-year procurement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases