PER CURIAM.
We reverse a summary judgment entered in favor of an insurance company in an action by an insured seeking coverage under a homeowner's policy. The trial court determined that there was no coverage because a third party's injuries were intentionally inflicted by the insured, Blosser, who contends that he was acting in self-defense. We note that the trial court did not have the benefit of Marshall v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
