1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 768 P.2d
  5. 768 P.2d 1123 (1989)
 

LUEDTKE v. NABORS ALASKA DRILLING, INC.

Nos. S-2074, S-2127.

768 P.2d 1123 (1989)

Clarence G. LUEDTKE, Appellant, v. NABORS ALASKA DRILLING, INC., Appellee. Paul M. LUEDTKE, Appellant, v. NABORS ALASKA DRILLING, INC., Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don Clocksin, Wagstaff, Pope & Clocksin, Cooperating Atty. for the Alaska Civil Liberties Union, Anchorage, and Douglas P. Elliott, Anchorage, for appellant Clarence G. Luedtke.

Charles W. Coe, Smith, Coe & Patterson, P.C., Anchorage, for appellant Paul M. Luedtke.

Mary Poteet, Winner & Associates, Anchorage, for appellee.

Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.

COMPTON, Justice.

This case addresses one aspect of drug testing by employers. A private employer, Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. (Nabors), established a drug testing program for its employees. Two Nabors employees, Clarence Luedtke and Paul Luedtke, both of whom worked on drilling rigs on the North Slope, refused to submit to urinalysis screening for drug use as required by Nabors. As a result they were fired by Nabors. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases