1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 890 F.2d
  5. 890 F.2d 996 (1989)
 

EAST BAY RUNNING STORE, INC. v. NIKE, INC.

No. 88-2011.

890 F.2d 996 (1989)

EAST BAY RUNNING STORE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIKE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 13, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied January 25, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Molinaro, Brandy & Molinaro, Wausau, Wis., Scott W. Hansen (argued), R. Timothy Muth, Reinhart, Boerner, Vandeuren, Norris & Rieselbach, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael Bowen (argued), Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant-appellee.

Before CUDAHY and KANNE, Circuit Judges, and WILL, Senior District Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 25, 1990.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

In the appeal of this diversity action, we are asked to interpret the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, Wis.Stat. §§ 135.01 et seq. (WFDL). East Bay Running Store, Inc., a retailer of athletic shoes and associated apparel, commenced an action against NIKE, Inc. alleging a violation of §§ 135.03 and 135.04 of the WFDL. Specifically, East Bay claimed that NIKE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases