DeBOTTON ET AL. v. PennDOT

No. 539 C.D. 1988.

123 Pa.Commw. 65 (1989)

552 A.2d 1150

Claude De Botton and Richard I. Rubin & Co., t/a Marple Associates, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation and Marple Township, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 24, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darryl J. May, with him, Michael Sklaroff and Joanne Phillips, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, for petitioner.

Michael L. Harvey, Deputy Attorney General with him, John G. Knorr, III, Chief Deputy Attorney General and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent, Department of Transportation, and Thomas M. Kettredge, with him, Rebecca J. Slaughter, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for respondent, Marple Township.

Argued June 15, 1988, before Judge SMITH, and Senior Judges KALISH and NARICK, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE SMITH, January 24, 1989:

Marple Associates (Petitioner), a business partnership maintained by Claude De Botton (De Botton) and Richard I. Rubin & Co., filed a petition for review addressed to this Court's original jurisdiction,1 naming the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT), and Marple Township (Township), Delaware County, as respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases