CURTIS v. INSURED LLOYD'S

No. 88-619.

546 So.2d 1326 (1989)

James H. CURTIS, Plaintiff and Appellant—Phares & Lites, v. INSURED LLOYD'S, Defendant and Appellee—Tri-State Underwriters.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, Brian Homza, Shreveport, for appellant.

Fish, Montgomery & Robinson, Roy Fish, Minden, for appellee.

Before: GUIDRY, FORET, and DOUCET, JJ.


DOUCET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Charlotte Krueger v. Billy Tabor, et al., 546 So.2d 1317 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1989), rendered this day, the judgment appealed is REVERSED IN PART, AMENDED IN PART, AND AS AMENDED, AFFIRMED in accordance with the views expressed in the companion case.

REVERSED IN PART; AMENDED IN PART, AND AS AMENDED...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases