PRINGLE v. STATE

No. 88-2643.

553 So.2d 1304 (1989)

Bobby PRINGLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 12, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Yvette Rhodes Prescott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE, and GERSTEN, JJ.


OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

GERSTEN, Judge.

On appellant's motion for rehearing and clarification, we deny the motion for rehearing and grant the motion for clarification only to the extent that we agree with appellant that there was no objection by appellant to the hearsay testimony given by the detective. We therefore withdraw our opinion issued September 26, 1989 and substitute in its stead the following amended opinion.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases