1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 152 Wis.2d
  5. 152 Wis.2d 33 (1989)
 

H.A. FREITAG & SON, INC. v. BUSH

No. 89-0015.

152 Wis.2d 33 (1989)

447 N.W.2d 71

H.A. FREITAG & SON, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phransay BUSH, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided August 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For plaintiff-appellant there were briefs by Carroll B. Callahan and Julia J. Groeschel of Callahan and Arnold, Columbus.

For defendant-respondent there was a brief by Gregory R. Wright and Shelia J. Kessler of Gregory R. Wright Law Offices, Montello.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.

MYSE, J.

H.A. Freitag & Son, Inc. appeals a judgment and order dismissing its complaint based upon the trial court's determination that the statute of limitations had run. Freitag contends that the court erred by concluding that the statute of limitations had run. While we agree with the trial court that the judicially created discovery rule applies, we conclude that the statute of limitations is measured from the date the plaintiff knew both that a conversion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases