E.I. du PONT de NEMOURS v. POLAROID GRAPHICS

Civ. A. No. 88-235 JRR.

706 F.Supp. 1135 (1989)

E.I. du PONT de NEMOURS & COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. POLAROID GRAPHICS IMAGING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Sutton and Jack B. Blumenfield of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del. of counsel: Joseph M. Fitzpatrick and Henry J. Renk of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City and Robert C. Kline, James A. Forstner and Annette L. Richter of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Peter M. Sieglaff of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del. of counsel: Frank P. Porcelli, John M. Skenyon, Charles Hieken and John R. Schiffhauer of Fish & Richardson, Boston, Mass., for defendant.


OPINION

ROTH, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this action, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company ("Du Pont"), charges the defendant, Polaroid Graphics Imaging, Inc. ("Polaroid"), with infringement1 of Du Pont's United States Patent No. 4,053,313 issued in the name of Roxy N. Fan (the "Fan patent") by its Spectra color proofing process. Presently before the Court are two motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases