CITY OF SALEM v. WOLF

87D-101400; CA A46107.

766 P.2d 1051 (1989)

94 Or. App. 654

CITY OF SALEM, Respondent, v. Gary C. WOLF, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 11, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl H. Brumund, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

George B. Stevenson, Asst. City Atty., Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction under Salem Revised Code § 95.430(a) for resisting a peace officer. He contends that the court erred in denying a motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument, arguing that the ordinance is unconstitutionally overbroad. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute, and the details are not essential to the legal issues raised by defendant. Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted.

Defendant argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases