UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Connie Lee BOLING, a/k/a Heller Boling (88-3130); Thomas A. Lauback (88-3216), Defendants-Appellants.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 15, 1988.
Decided September 7, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John M. DiPuccio (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, Patty Merkamp Stemler, Appellate Section, Crim. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Daniel A. Brown (argued), Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, William J. Abraham (argued), Columbus, Ohio, for defendants-appellants.
Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, and THOMAS, Senior District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
In its original per curiam opinion, 869 F.2d 965 (6th Cir.1989), this panel found "that the jury could have found the essential elements of mail and wire fraud beyond a reasonable doubt on all counts against both Lauback and Boling." However, "because Boling's attorney was burdened by an active conflict of interest," the panel reversed "her [Boling's] conviction on the conspiracy count" and remanded for a new...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
