1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 783 P.2d
  5. 783 P.2d 1022 (1989)
 

LEDBURY v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.

WCB 87-03490; CA A60016.

783 P.2d 1022 (1989)

In the matter of the Compensation of Phillip E. LEDBURY, Claimant. Phillip E. Ledbury, Petitioner, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Rodney Kirkpatrick, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief, was Kirkpatrick & Zeitz, Portland.

William D. Peek, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief, were Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., P.C., and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

GRABER, Presiding Judge.

Claimant petitions for review of the Workers' Compensation Board's decision to deny benefits. He argues that the order is not supported by substantial evidence, that the Board improperly failed to adhere to the referee's findings on credibility, and that the Board relied on allegedly inaccurate and irrelevant evidence. We affirm and write only to discuss the second issue.

Claimant alleges that he sustained a work-related injury on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases