U.S. v. OVERMYER

No. 87-3488.

867 F.2d 937 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel H. OVERMYER, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 10, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied March 24, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Lynch (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stanley Arkin, Marc Bogatin (argued), Arkin & Arisohn, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 24, 1989.

HACKETT, District Judge.

The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, granting defendant's motion for acquittal under F.R.Crim.P. 29(c). Appellant contends that when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government, a reasonable jury could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. After a thorough review of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases