MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF STICE

TC CV87-0424; CA A47952; SC S35939.

779 P.2d 1020 (1989)

308 Or. 316

In the matter of the Marriage of Theodora J. STICE, Petitioner On Review, AND I. Harold Stice, Jr., Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 6, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied October 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Brown, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Harold S. Harding, Corvallis, and Enfield, Guimond & Brown, Salem.

Larry W. Stuber, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent on review.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice.

ORS 107.105(1)(f) provides in part:

"Whenever the court grants a decree of marital annulment, dissolution or separation, it has the power further to decree as follows: "* * * * * "For the division or other disposition between the parties of the real or personal property, or both, of either or both of the parties as may be just and proper in all the circumstances. * * * The court shall consider the contribution of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases