1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 875 F.2d
  5. 875 F.2d 890 (1989)
 

DANIK, INC. v. HARTMARX CORP.

No. 88-7089.

875 F.2d 890 (1989)

DANIK, INC., D.C. Corporation, on behalf of self and others similarly situated, Cooter & Gell, Appellant, v. HARTMARX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, et al. Appeal of COOTER & GELL.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 19, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale A. Cooter, with whom Joseph M. Cahill, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mark W. Ryan, with whom Richard J. Favretto and Evan M. Tager, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees. Kenneth S. Geller and Douglas K. Mayer, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellees.

Before STARR, WILLIAMS and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.

D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from an antitrust action that appellants Cooter & Gell, a law firm, brought on behalf of their client, Danik, Inc., a Washington, D.C. discount clothing retailer. The defendants in that action are appellees here: Hartmarx Corp. and its subsidiaries, Hickey-Freeman Co. (HF) and Hart, Schaffner & Marx (HSM) — collectively, the Hartmarx...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases