1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 703 F.Supp.
  5. 703 F.Supp. 1062 (1989)
 

HORN & HARDART CO. v. PILLSBURY CO.

No. 85 Civ. 5463 (WK).

703 F.Supp. 1062 (1989)

The HORN & HARDART COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The PILLSBURY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald S. Rauchberg, James F. Parver, Bradley I. Ruskin, Linda S. Gorby, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for plaintiff.

Stuart L. Shapiro, Peter E. Greene, Cornelius J. Grealy, David G. Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

This has been a complex and bitterly contested litigation between The Horn & Hardart Company and The Pillsbury Company, who, if this court's experience is any guide, spend most of their time and energy litigating with each other. Pillsbury, the defendant in the instant action, seeks to dispose of it by motion for summary judgment. For reasons that follow, we grant the motion and dismiss the action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases