STATE v. BROWN

10-88-00886; CA A48937.

778 P.2d 976 (1989)

98 Or.App. 129

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Leonard Allen BROWN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven V. Humber, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Salem, and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals a conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns as error that the court denied his motion under Article I, Section 9, and the Fourth Amendment, to suppress evidence that the police seized without a warrant. We affirm.

At the suppression hearing, Officer Wells, whom the state called, and Jackson, whom defendant called, were the only witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases