1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 778 P.2d
  5. 778 P.2d 967 (1989)
 

AMFAC, INC. v. GARCIA-MACIEL

Nos. 86-07831 & 86-07830, 86-11196, 86-03489, 86-07590; A49398 (Control), A49399, A49400, A49401.

778 P.2d 967 (1989)

98 Or.App. 88

In the matter of the Compensation of Manuel Garcia-Maciel, Claimant. AMFAC, INC., Respondent, v. Manuel GARCIA-MACIEL and Oregon Garden Products, Respondents, and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Petitioners. In the matter of the Compensation of Jane E. Stanley, Claimant. K-Mart Corp., Respondent, v. JANE E. STANLEY, Respondent, and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Petitioners. In the matter of the Compensation of Phillip Carpenter, Claimant. Montgomery Ward & Co. and Aetna Casualty Co., Respondents, v. PHILLIP CARPENTER, Respondent, and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Petitioners. In the matter of the Compensation of Elmer Jacobs, Claimant. Weyerhaeuser Company, Respondent, v. Elmer Jacobs, Respondent, and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt and Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., P.C., Portland.

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, waived appearance for respondents Manuel Garcia-Maciel and Phillip Carpenter.

Robert Wollheim, Portland, waived appearance for respondent Jane E. Stanley.

No appearance for respondents Amfac, Inc., Oregon Garden Products, K-Mart Corp., Montgomery Ward & Co., Aetna Cas. Co., Weyerhaeuser Co. and Elmer Jacobs.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners are attorneys. They seek review of the Workers' Compensation Board's denial of their requests for approval of "client-paid" attorney fees in four Board proceedings1 in which petitioners represented employers or self-employed insurers. See ORS 656.388(1). The Board based the denial on petitioners' failure to file their requests within 15 days after the last brief was filed in each of the proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases