TUM-A-LUM LUMBER v. PATRICK

CSC 87-0858, CA A48888.

770 P.2d 964 (1989)

95 Or.App. 719

TUM-A-LUM LUMBER, Respondent, v. Richard and Jean PATRICK, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 22, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale L. Smith, Hermiston, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Reynolds & Smith, P.C., Hermiston.

Brant Medonich, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Kottkamp & O'Rourke, Pendleton.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Defendants appeal from a judgment after a jury trial, assigning as error the trial court's denial of their motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. ORCP 21 A. We reverse.1

We accept the facts pled by plaintiff as true. Sager v. McClenden, 296 Or. 33, 35, 672 P.2d 697 (1983). Plaintiff alleged that defendants entered into a construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases